What Is the Problem?
Unsolicited, mass e-mail:
- •is cheap to senders but may impose costs on the recipient’s time and/or the recipient’s online account.
- •may contain objectionable content (political, commercial ads, solicitations for funds, pornography, etc.).
- •may contain a disguised return address.
- •may pass through filters.
- •invades privacy.
- •creates a financial and managerial burden on ISPs.
Cases and Free Speech Issues:
AOL v. Cyber Promotions
- •AOL and other service providers have successfully sued spammers because of the cost burden imposed.
Disgruntled Intel Employee
- •Initially, a court ruled that non-commercial spam to Intel employees at their Intel e-mail accounts was a form of trespass.
- •The CA Supreme Court ruled that it was not.
Solutions:
- •Technology: filters that screen out spam.
- •Market Pressure: services that list spammers.
- •Business Policy: at the discretion of the recipient, all e-mail would be charged a microfee.
- •Law: create restrictions that are consistent with the First Amendment.
- •Vigilantism: punish spammers by hacking into their phone or computer systems.

No comments:
Post a Comment